Re: [PATCH 19/22] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor memory barrier for reentrant probe

From: Ilpo Järvinen

Date: Tue Mar 17 2026 - 12:45:42 EST


On Thu, 12 Mar 2026, David E. Box wrote:

> From: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Switch the readiness synchronization from a global device_probed flag to
> per-index devid publication.

It would be nice if you could expand the synchronization explanation a
bit. It's mostly in the comments below but it wouldn't hurt to add it here
as well.

> This is required because a subsequent patch
> makes probe reentrant, so a single global flag can no longer reliably
> signal completion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Pardee <xi.pardee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c | 34 ++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> index 7db98037c521..246efdcf6950 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ static const struct ssram_type pci_main = {
> };
>
> static struct pmc_ssram_telemetry pmc_ssram_telems[3];
> -static bool device_probed;
>
> static inline u64 get_base(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset)
> {
> @@ -52,8 +51,13 @@ static void pmc_ssram_get_devid_pwrmbase(void __iomem *ssram, unsigned int pmc_i
> pwrm_base = get_base(ssram, SSRAM_PWRM_OFFSET);
> devid = readw(ssram + SSRAM_DEVID_OFFSET);
>
> - pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid = devid;
> pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].base_addr = pwrm_base;
> + /*
> + * Memory barrier is used to ensure the correct write order between base_addr
> + * and devid.
> + */
> + smp_wmb();
> + pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid = devid;
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -151,32 +155,28 @@ static int pmc_ssram_telemetry_pci_init(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> * * 0 - Success
> * * -EAGAIN - Probe function has not finished yet. Try again.
> * * -EINVAL - Invalid pmc_idx
> - * * -ENODEV - PMC device is not available
> */
> int pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc_info(unsigned int pmc_idx,
> struct pmc_ssram_telemetry *pmc_ssram_telemetry)
> {
> + if (pmc_idx >= MAX_NUM_PMC)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /*
> * PMCs are discovered in probe function. If this function is called before
> - * probe function complete, the result would be invalid. Use device_probed
> - * variable to avoid this case. Return -EAGAIN to inform the consumer to call
> + * probe function complete, the result would be invalid. Use devid to avoid
> + * this case. Return -EAGAIN to inform the consumer to call
> * again later.
> */
> - if (!device_probed)
> + if (!pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid)
> return -EAGAIN;
>
> + pmc_ssram_telemetry->devid = pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid;
> /*
> * Memory barrier is used to ensure the correct read order between
> - * device_probed variable and PMC info.
> + * devid variable and base_addr.
> */
> smp_rmb();
> - if (pmc_idx >= MAX_NUM_PMC)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - if (!pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid)
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - pmc_ssram_telemetry->devid = pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].devid;
> pmc_ssram_telemetry->base_addr = pmc_ssram_telems[pmc_idx].base_addr;
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -209,12 +209,6 @@ static int pmc_ssram_telemetry_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_de
> ret = -EINVAL;
>
> probe_finish:

This label becomes pointless after the removal and the gotoers should just
return directly.

> - /*
> - * Memory barrier is used to ensure the correct write order between PMC info
> - * and device_probed variable.
> - */
> - smp_wmb();
> - device_probed = true;
> return ret;

--
i.