Re: [PATCH] arm64: Kconfig: provide a top-level switch for Microchip platforms

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 9:58 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/03/2026 09:32, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's the previous discussion when this was added not too long ago:
> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250811122053.4bfyoefln7wpz2a4@DEN-DL-M70577/
> >>>>
> >>>> Daniel is probably the one that "needs" to answer this, I think the
> >>>> lan969x is added recently enough for this to not be particularly
> >>>> disruptive.
> >>>
> >>> I don't get arguments there. The policy is one ARCH per vendor, so why
> >>> exactly upstream would like to "having more granular control with
> >>> separate"? That's downstream or vendor wishlist, not upstream.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Krzysztof
> >>
> >> The out-of-tree defconfig impact is minimal for us. As Conor mentioned, lan969x
> >> was added fairly recently, so the number of affected users should be small.
> >>
> >> /Daniel
> >
> > So can this be picked up directly into ARM-SoC please?
>
> This should go rather via Microchip ARM64 tree.
>

Hey Microchip maintainers, can you please pick it up for v7.1?

Bartosz