Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add qcs9075-radxa-airbox-q900

[mecid]

On 2026-03-18 09:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 18/03/2026 09:36, Mecid Urganci wrote:
> > Add device tree binding for the Radxa AirBox Q900 board based on
> > the Qualcomm QCS9075 SoC.
>
> What is QCS9075? It's the first time this compatible appears and the
> only other reference is socinfo commit which told nothing.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mecid Urganci <mecid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml 
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > index 8c3df8efaa4d..2c492f4d784a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
> > @@ -909,6 +909,12 @@ properties:
> >                - qcom,sa8775p-ride-r3
> >            - const: qcom,sa8775p
> >
> > +      - items:
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - radxa,airbox-q900
> > +          - const: qcom,qcs9075
> > +          - const: qcom,sa8775p
>
> Why qcs9075 is compatible with sa8775p?

Thank you for your feedback.

Yes from public information it is the same SoC without the automotive 
security features. Should I remove the qcs9075 reference and only keep 
qcom,sa8775p?

Here it is listed as part of lemans:
https://linux-msm.github.io/mainline-status/soc/lemans

Best regards,
Mecid Urganci

> > +
> >        - items:
> >            - enum:
> >                - qcom,lemans-evk
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof