Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add new system call for non-destructive peek and inspection to posix ipc mqueue

[Mathura]

Hi Geert Uytterhoeven,
Just forget everything that about  work submitted in two weeks ago
Patch,that is a waste of time to talk, earlier work is  messed up ,no
modularity , Please focus on the current version that has all related
information in the cover letter.
This is fresh work -
 v1- https://lore.kernel.org/20260306075009.83723-1-academic1mathura@xxxxxxxxx
 v2-  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/CAMuHMdV4MTNUmZdqMd+PhChDLL6yom2zj1bsiJfiK5+gr+j7Ow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t

I am resending this email as I was out of station earlier. The main
list could not be submitted previously because plain text mode was not
accessible on my phone.

Kindly review the resubmitted details.

Thank you for your understanding.


On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 at 15:49, Mathura <academic1mathura@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Greet,
> Just forget everything that about  work submitted in two weeks ago Patch,that is a waste of time to talk, earlier work is  messed up ,no modularity , Please focus on the current version that has all related information in the cover letter.
> This is fresh work -
>  v1- https://lore.kernel.org/20260306075009.83723-1-academic1mathura@xxxxxxxxx
>  v2-  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/CAMuHMdV4MTNUmZdqMd+PhChDLL6yom2zj1bsiJfiK5+gr+j7Ow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 at 15:20, Mathura <academic1mathura@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I have discarded all previous work and earlier patches, as most of the implementation has been redone from scratch using a completely new approach.
>> Therefore, please disregard the patches from two weeks ago and review this as a fresh series.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Mar, 2026, 2:01 pm Geert Uytterhoeven, <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mathura,
>>>
>>> On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 at 22:47, Mathura_Kumar <academic1mathura@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > Patch series overview:
>>> >
>>> >   1. Add New system call do_mq_timedreceive2() and handler implementation
>>> >   2. Add system call number in all  most common arch.
>>> >   3. Prepared Documentation and test
>>> >   4. Add entry in performance tools all most common file
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Short Description:
>>> >
>>> >     POSIX message queues currently lack a mechanism to read
>>> >     a message without removing it from the queue. This is a
>>> >     long-standing limitation,when we require inspection of queue state
>>> >     without altering it.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Thanks for your series!
>>>
>>> > change since v1:
>>> >  - minor update, header guard was removed from include/uapi/linux/mqueue.h
>>> >  - v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260315040827.156558-1-academic1mathura@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t
>>>
>>> Weren't you at v5 before, so how did you get to v1 and v2 again?
>>> What has changed?
>>>
>>> "[PATCH] [PATCH V5] mqueue: introduce new do_mq_timedreceive2() [
>>> mq_peek syscall] for non-destructive receive and inspection,fix minor
>>> issue,prepared doc."
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/20260306075009.83723-1-academic1mathura@xxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>>>
>>>                         Geert
>>>
>>> --
>>> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
>>> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>>>                                 -- Linus Torvalds