Re: [PATCH v5 04/22] x86/virt/seamldr: Introduce a wrapper for P-SEAMLDR SEAMCALLs

[Chao Gao]

>> I didn't realize that. Thanks for the information.
>> 
>> But I don't think this is a stale reference. The SDM description is high-level
>> and points to the same spec for details:
>> 
>>    The details of such transitions are specified in the Intel® Trust Domain CPU
>>    Architectural Extensions.
>
>The old "Intel® Trust Domain CPU Architectural Extensions" spec has bugs.
>Remember
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251014231042.1399849-1-seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx/ ?
>They have been corrected in SDM.
>
>I'm not trying to say it's a stale reference. I just think directing people
>to an old doc (especially with an exact revision number) can make them get
>outdated and incorrect information.

Ok. Let me drop the whole paragraph.