Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: dma: arm-dma350: document generic and combined IRQ topologies

[Peter Chen]

On 26-03-20 10:43:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> 
> On 20/03/2026 10:38, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On 26-03-20 10:12:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 06:17:21PM +0800, Jun Guo wrote:
> >>> Update the DMA-350 DT binding to match the current driver behavior.
> >>>
> >>> Allow both:
> >>> - "arm,dma-350" as the generic compatible, and
> >>> - "cix,sky1-dma-350", "arm,dma-350" for SoC-specific fallback usage.
> >>>
> >>> Also document interrupt topology variants supported by hardware
> >>> integration:
> >>> - one combined interrupt for all channels, or
> >>> - one interrupt per channel (up to 8 channels).
> >>>
> >>> This patch is Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex.
> >>
> >> Wrong tag, please read carefully the guideline before using LLM tools.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > It is the trade off for coding-assistants.rst suggestion and
> > passing checkpatch.pl. Currently, checkpatch.pl reports the
> > error for tag without email address. So we choose to add tag
> > description at patch context.
> 
> You still have to use correct tag.

You mean even checkpatch.pl reports below error, we still add it
"Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex" as tag?

WARNING: Non-standard signature: Assisted-by:
#14:
Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex

ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex'
#14:
Assisted-by: Cursor: GPT-5.3 Codex

> You ignored rest of the email
> message, so I assume you agree that you should not send LLM microslop?
> 

I am not the patch author, Jun will reply it.
I come in to discuss this patch duo to I suggested Jun adding LLM tag
at patch context.

-- 

Best regards,
Peter