Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/virt/tdx: Use PFN directly for mapping guest private memory

[Edgecombe, Rick P]

On Fri, 2026-03-20 at 12:59 +0000, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> > I feel like we argued about this before. But it would be more correct to
> > just drop level and make it 4k only until huge pages? Otherwise we are
> > tweaking dead behavior.
> 
> I guess. But you add one more thing on the list to remember when adding
> huge page support. This kind of stuff is easy to miss.

I guess I'm fine either way. I'm not sure Dave will like adding dead branches
though. I suppose huge pages is close enough that we are looking to merge prep
work anyway.