Re: [PATCH 04/14] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages

From: Samiullah Khawaja

Date: Fri Mar 20 2026 - 14:35:04 EST


On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 09:28:28AM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 01:59:03PM -0700, Vipin Sharma wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 10:09:38PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> +
> +void iommu_unpreserve_pages(struct iommu_pages_list *list, int count)
> +{
> + struct ioptdesc *iopt;
> +
> + if (!count)
> + return;
> +
> + /* If less than zero then unpreserve all pages. */
> + if (count < 0)
> + count = 0;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(iopt, &list->pages, iopt_freelist_elm) {
> + kho_unpreserve_folio(ioptdesc_folio(iopt));
> + if (count > 0 && --count == 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +}

I see you are trying to have common function for error handling in
iommu_preserve_pages() down and unpreserving in the next patch with
overloaded meaning of count.

< 0 means unpreserve all of the pages
= 0 means do nothing
> 0 unpreserve these many pages.

It seems non-intuitive to me and code also end up having multiple ifs. I
will recommend to just have this function go through all of the pages
without passing count argument. In iommu_preserve_pages() function down,
handle the error case with a "goto err" statement. If this is the way
things happen in iommu codebase feel free to ignore this suggestion.


+1 to this. The current version of overloaded count is counter-intuitive
as it expects a back-handed API contract. Since we're using lists here,
I'd recommend using the list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse() helper:

Agreed. I will use this approach in next revision.

Thanks,
Sami


+void iommu_unpreserve_pages(struct iommu_pages_list *list)
+{
+ struct ioptdesc *iopt;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(iopt, &list->pages, iopt_freelist_elm)
+ kho_unpreserve_folio(ioptdesc_folio(iopt));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_unpreserve_pages);
+
+int iommu_preserve_pages(struct iommu_pages_list *list)
+{
+ struct ioptdesc *iopt;
+ int ret;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(iopt, &list->pages, iopt_freelist_elm) {
+ ret = kho_preserve_folio(ioptdesc_folio(iopt));
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_rollback;
+ }
+ return 0;
+
+err_rollback:
+ /* Rollback only the successfully preserved pages */
+ list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(iopt, &list->pages, iopt_freelist_elm)
+ kho_unpreserve_folio(ioptdesc_folio(iopt));
+ return ret;
+}

[ ---- snip >8---- ]

Thanks,
Praan