Re: [PATCH 5/8] mm/mglru: use a smaller batch for reclaim

[Axel Rasmussen]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 12:11 PM Kairui Song via B4 Relay
<devnull+kasong.tencent.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> With a fixed number to reclaim calculated at the beginning, making each
> following step smaller should reduce the lock contention and avoid
> over-aggressive reclaim of folios, as it will abort earlier when the
> number of folios to be reclaimed is reached.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 4f4548ff3a17..2ff1609ff4de 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -5007,7 +5007,7 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
>                         break;
>                 }
>
> -               nr_batch = min(nr_to_scan, MAX_LRU_BATCH);
> +               nr_batch = min(nr_to_scan, MIN_LRU_BATCH);
>                 delta = evict_folios(nr_batch, lruvec, sc, swappiness);
>                 if (!delta)
>                         break;
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>