Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Novatek NT35532 LCD DSI

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Sat Mar 21 2026 - 05:56:55 EST


On 20/03/2026 23:32, cristian_ci wrote:
> On Thursday, March 19th, 2026 at 10:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 11:28:09PM +0100, Cristian Cozzolino wrote:
>>> + avdd-supply:
>>> + description: positive boost supply regulator
>>> +
>>> + avee-supply:
>>> + description: negative boost supply regulator
>>> +
>>> + vci-supply:
>>> + description: regulator that supplies the analog voltage
>>> +
>>> + vddam-supply:
>>> + description: power supply for MIPI interface
>>> +
>>> + vddi-supply:
>>> + description: regulator that supplies the I/O voltage
>>> +
>>> + port: true
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> + - reset-gpios
>>> + - avdd-supply
>>> + - avee-supply
>>> + - vci-supply
>>
>> Only VDDI is required according to datasheet (see page 11 and page 16).
>
> Just to be sure, are you mentioning the part saying there are multiple
> power modes (2-1PWR, 2-2PWR, 3éWR and 4PWR) related to NT35532?
>
>> Others are needed only in specific configurations, which I would ignore
>> for the simplicity of the binding. Drop these three.
>>
>> Previous discussion point was about this - write bindings based on
>> datasheet, since it is available.
>
> I've removed avdd, avee and vci supplies from 'required' properties
> and I've also tested the new bindings (just for completeness). Now,
> I'm going to reintroduce again the issue already raised previously
> (for which I received no replies in v1): should I submit a v3
> series including my new changes or I've to stick with v2 here, in
> order to address review concerns about binding, first?
>

I don't understand the question. This is v2, right? So I asked to make
changes to it, thus you should submit v3 after receiving some more
review for example.

Best regards,
Krzysztof