Re: [RFC v1 0/8] acpi/x86: s2idle: Introduce and implement runtime standby ABI for ACPI s0ix platforms

Next message: Gavin Shan: "Re: [PATCH v6 01/40] arm_mpam: Ensure in_reset_state is false after applying configuration"
Previous message: Yu Kuai: "Re: [PATCH v2] blk-wbt: remove WARN_ON_ONCE from wbt_init_enable_default()"
In reply to: Antheas Kapenekakis: "Re: [RFC v1 0/8] acpi/x86: s2idle: Introduce and implement runtime standby ABI for ACPI s0ix platforms"
Next in thread: Antheas Kapenekakis: "Re: [RFC v1 0/8] acpi/x86: s2idle: Introduce and implement runtime standby ABI for ACPI s0ix platforms"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Mario Limonciello

Date: Mon Mar 23 2026 - 00:36:47 EST

I wouldn't call platform_profile ACPI either, but it just kind of
ended up there.

Exactly, it's not the best place for it, but now it's ABI.

Where would be a better position for it?

I would say it depends upon how generic it ends up being. Maybe /sys/kernel if it is very generic. Maybe /sys/power if it's more narrow and only going to be for affecting power related things.