Re: [PATCH 3/5] driver core: async device shutdown infrastructure

From: David Jeffery

Date: Mon Mar 23 2026 - 10:31:03 EST


On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 5:50 AM Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu Mar 19, 2026 at 3:11 PM CET, David Jeffery wrote:
> > Patterned after async suspend, allow devices to mark themselves as wanting
> > to perform async shutdown. Devices using async shutdown wait only for their
> > dependencies to shutdown before executing their shutdown routine.
> >
> > Sync shutdown devices are shut down one at a time and will only wait for an
> > async shutdown device if the async device is a dependency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/base.h | 2 +
> > drivers/base/core.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/device.h | 13 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
> > index 79d031d2d845..ea2a039e7907 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/base.h
> > +++ b/drivers/base/base.h
> > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct driver_type {
> > * @device - pointer back to the struct device that this structure is
> > * associated with.
> > * @driver_type - The type of the bound Rust driver.
> > + * @complete - completion for device shutdown ordering
> > * @dead - This device is currently either in the process of or has been
> > * removed from the system. Any asynchronous events scheduled for this
> > * device should exit without taking any action.
> > @@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ struct device_private {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_RUST
> > struct driver_type driver_type;
> > #endif
> > + struct completion complete;
> > u8 dead:1;
> > };
> > #define to_device_private_parent(obj) \
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> > index 2e9094f5c5aa..53568b820a13 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#include <linux/async.h>
> > #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> > #include <linux/cleanup.h>
> > #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> > @@ -37,6 +38,10 @@
> > #include "physical_location.h"
> > #include "power/power.h"
> >
> > +static bool async_shutdown = true;
> > +module_param(async_shutdown, bool, 0644);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(async_shutdown, "Enable asynchronous device shutdown support");
> > +
> > /* Device links support. */
> > static LIST_HEAD(deferred_sync);
> > static unsigned int defer_sync_state_count = 1;
> > @@ -3538,6 +3543,7 @@ static int device_private_init(struct device *dev)
> > klist_init(&dev->p->klist_children, klist_children_get,
> > klist_children_put);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->p->deferred_probe);
> > + init_completion(&dev->p->complete);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -4782,6 +4788,37 @@ int device_change_owner(struct device *dev, kuid_t kuid, kgid_t kgid)
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool wants_async_shutdown(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + return async_shutdown && dev->async_shutdown;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int wait_for_device_shutdown(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + bool async = *(bool *)data;
> > +
> > + if (async || wants_async_shutdown(dev))
> > + wait_for_completion(&dev->p->complete);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void wait_for_shutdown_dependencies(struct device *dev, bool async)
> > +{
> > + struct device_link *link;
> > + int idx;
> > +
> > + device_for_each_child(dev, &async, wait_for_device_shutdown);
> > +
> > + idx = device_links_read_lock();
> > +
> > + dev_for_each_link_to_consumer(link, dev)
> > + if (!device_link_flag_is_sync_state_only(link->flags))
> > + wait_for_device_shutdown(link->consumer, &async);
> > +
> > + device_links_read_unlock(idx);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void __shutdown_one_device(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > device_lock(dev);
> > @@ -4805,6 +4842,8 @@ static void __shutdown_one_device(struct device *dev)
> > dev->driver->shutdown(dev);
> > }
> >
> > + complete_all(&dev->p->complete);
> > +
> > device_unlock(dev);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -4823,6 +4862,58 @@ static void shutdown_one_device(struct device *dev)
> > put_device(dev);
> > }
> >
> > +static void async_shutdown_handler(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = data;
> > +
> > + wait_for_shutdown_dependencies(dev, true);
> > + shutdown_one_device(dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool shutdown_device_async(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (async_schedule_dev_nocall(async_shutdown_handler, dev))
> > + return true;
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > +static void early_async_shutdown_devices(void)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev, *next, *needs_put = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (!async_shutdown)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&devices_kset->list_lock);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(dev, next, &devices_kset->list,
> > + kobj.entry) {
> > + if (wants_async_shutdown(dev)) {
> > + get_device(dev->parent);
> > + get_device(dev);
> > +
> > + if (shutdown_device_async(dev)) {
> > + list_del_init(&dev->kobj.entry);
> > + } else {
> > + /*
> > + * async failed, clean up extra references
> > + * and run from the standard shutdown loop
> > + */
> > + needs_put = dev;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock(&devices_kset->list_lock);
> > +
> > + if (needs_put) {
> > + put_device(needs_put->parent);
> > + put_device(needs_put);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * device_shutdown - call ->shutdown() on each device to shutdown.
> > */
> > @@ -4835,6 +4926,12 @@ void device_shutdown(void)
> >
> > cpufreq_suspend();
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Start async device threads where possible to maximize potential
> > + * parallelism and minimize false dependency on unrelated sync devices
> > + */
> > + early_async_shutdown_devices();
> > +
> > spin_lock(&devices_kset->list_lock);
> > /*
> > * Walk the devices list backward, shutting down each in turn.
> > @@ -4859,11 +4956,16 @@ void device_shutdown(void)
> > list_del_init(&dev->kobj.entry);
> > spin_unlock(&devices_kset->list_lock);
> >
> > - shutdown_one_device(dev);
> > + if (!wants_async_shutdown(dev) || !shutdown_device_async(dev)) {
> > + wait_for_shutdown_dependencies(dev, false);
> > + shutdown_one_device(dev);
> > + }
> >
> > spin_lock(&devices_kset->list_lock);
> > }
> > spin_unlock(&devices_kset->list_lock);
> > +
> > + async_synchronize_full();
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> > index 0be95294b6e6..da1db7d235c9 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/device.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> > @@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ struct device_physical_location {
> > * @dma_skip_sync: DMA sync operations can be skipped for coherent buffers.
> > * @dma_iommu: Device is using default IOMMU implementation for DMA and
> > * doesn't rely on dma_ops structure.
> > + * @async_shutdown: Device shutdown may be run asynchronously and in parallel
> > + * to the shutdown of unrelated devices
> > *
> > * At the lowest level, every device in a Linux system is represented by an
> > * instance of struct device. The device structure contains the information
> > @@ -669,6 +671,7 @@ struct device {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA
> > bool dma_iommu:1;
> > #endif
> > + bool async_shutdown:1;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -824,6 +827,16 @@ static inline bool device_async_suspend_enabled(struct device *dev)
> > return !!dev->power.async_suspend;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool device_enable_async_shutdown(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + return dev->async_shutdown = true;
> > +}
>
> Shouldn't this function just return void?

Yes, it should just be changed to a void.

David Jeffery