Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] dt-bindings: soc: move and rename google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen schema under soc/samsung/

[Alexey Klimov]

On Mon Mar 23, 2026 at 4:03 PM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/03/2026 16:42, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>> On Sat Mar 7, 2026 at 5:03 PM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 26/02/2026 16:47, Alexey Klimov wrote:
>>>> The GS101 PMU interrupts generation block is actually a standard Samsung
>>>> Exynos IP block found in older SoCs like the Exynos 850 and others and
>>>> not exclusive to Google SoCs. Thus, renaming to
>>>> samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen, moving the schema file to soc/samsung
>>>> directory to reflect its origin, since Exynos850 predates GS101 SoCs,
>>>> and preparing for adding Exynos850 description.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml}                              | 4 ++--
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/google/google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>>> similarity index 80%
>>>> rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/google/google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>>> rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>>> index 2be022ca6a7d..f9b40f3fd165 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/google/google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml
>>>> @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
>>>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>>>  %YAML 1.2
>>>>  ---
>>>> -$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/google/google,gs101-pmu-intr-gen.yaml#
>>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/samsung/samsung,exynos850-pmu-intr-gen.yaml#
>>>>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>>>  
>>>> -title: Google Power Management Unit (PMU) Interrupt Generation
>>>> +title: Samsung Power Management Unit (PMU) Interrupt Generation
>>>
>>> Rename is fine if you add here compatible, otherwise the name does not
>>> match the compatible.
>> 
>> Thanks, I'll rearrange commits then to make it sane in the next submission.
>
> If you re-order then the case will be the same. Filename will not match
> compatible. IOW, rename is not a logical change on its own.

I probably should have used another word for this.
I am not going to *just* re-order.

Thanks,
Alexey