Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] nvmem: remove unneeded __nvmem_device_put()
From: Johan Hovold
Date: Mon Mar 23 2026 - 13:10:42 EST
On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> __nvmem_device_put() is wrapped by nvmem_device_put() but there's no
> extra functionality offered by the latter so just fold one into the
> other.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 23 +++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 42827ba2146ce9ba07716ac5973327da6e9426da..30aee8089f1dc65b1fa07dac8fb35e1dbbcd0ce7 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -1134,13 +1134,6 @@ static struct nvmem_device *__nvmem_device_get(void *data,
> return nvmem;
> }
>
> -static void __nvmem_device_put(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
> -{
> - put_device(&nvmem->dev);
> - module_put(nvmem->owner);
> - kref_put(&nvmem->refcnt, nvmem_device_release);
> -}
Not sure this is a good idea since __nvmem_device_put() here matches
__nvmem_device_get() just above (and we already have
nvmem_device_get()).
Keeping them together and as the inverse of each other should prevent
things from getting out of sync.
I'd just leave this as is for now.
Johan