Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] dt-bindings: connector: m2: Add M.2 1620 LGA soldered down connector

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 05:14:30PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 07:14:25PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:39:55AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 7:16 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 06:37:13PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 09:59:56AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > > > Lenovo Thinkpad T14s is found to have a soldered down version of M.2 1620
> > > > > > LGA connector. Though, there is no 1620 LGA form factor defined in the M.2
> > > > > > spec, it looks very similar to the M.2 Key E connector. So add the
> > > > > > "pcie-m2-1620-lga-connector" compatible with "pcie-m2-e-connector" fallback
> > > > > > to reuse the Key E binding.
> > > > >
> > > > > What is LGA?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Land Grid Array
> > > >
> > > > > If not in the spec, is it really something generic?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Good question. Yes and No! LGA is not something that Lenovo only uses. Other
> > > > vendors may also use this form factor. PCIe connectors are full of innovation as
> > > > the spec gives room for hardware designers to be as innovative as possible to
> > > > save the BOM cost.
> > > 
> > > innovation == incompatible changes
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, I was trying to sound nice :)
> > 
> > > > This is why I do not want to make it Lenovo specific. But if you prefer that, I
> > > > can name it as "lenovo,pcie-m2-1620-lga-connector".
> > > 
> > > Depends if you think that s/w needs to know the differences. Hard to
> > > say with a sample size of 1.
> > > 
> > 
> > Sure. Will add the 'lenovo' prefix then.
> 
> Is it really Lenovo? Or is it some other module vendor, whose LGAs are
> being used by Lenovo?
> 
> I remember that DB820c also used some kind of a module for the WiFi card
> (which might be M.2 compatible or might not, I can't find exact docs at
> this point).
> 

I don't know. These kind of designs might be reused by several vendors. But
considering that we should not make it generic, I'd go with Lenovo as that's
the only vendor we know as of now.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்