Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mediatek,g3dsys: Convert to DT schema

[Uday Kiran]

On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 3:27 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 20/03/2026 19:00, Uday Kiran wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 7:55 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> +
> >>> +  "#clock-cells":
> >>> +    const: 1
> >>> +    description: Number of cells in a clock specifier
> >>
> >> $ git grep "Number of cells in a clock specifier"
> >
> > Sorry Krzysztof, I didn't understand what you meant. I've tried executing
> > git grep, but there are no results apart from my commit. But, I've found it
>
> Exactly.
>
> Therefore why would you write a style code which does not exist in the
> kernel? Why doing this completely different than everyone else?

I understand now that it is redundant to add the description for provider
properties. I’ve removed the description and aligned the schema with
existing kernel style.

>
> > in clock-binding.txt i.e., in clock.yaml in github. After careful study of
> > guidelines.I've removed the description of provider properties.
> > Please let me know if there is any deviation in my understanding!!> >
> >> Your mentors were supposed to be Cc-ed here.
> >
> > I'm part of the Linux Kernel Spring Unpaid 2026 Mentorship program and
> > I've already Cc-ed Shuah in the mailing list.
>
> Does that mean LFX mentorship also has sub-program like GSoC for
> bindings conversion?  Does this program at least incorporated our
> feedback from two years and year ago?
>

It is similar in structure to GSoC, but it is not specific to bindings
conversion. We can contribute on any subsystem of kernel and I'm
trying to align my work with existing kernel conventions and feedback
from maintainers.

Regards,
Udaya Kiran Challa