Re: [patch v2 05/14] genirq: Expose nr_irqs in core code
From: Radu Rendec
Date: Mon Mar 23 2026 - 15:49:14 EST
On Fri, 2026-03-20 at 14:21 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> ... to avoid function calls in the core code to retrieve the maximum number
> of interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Ilvokhin <d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/irq/internals.h | 1 +
> kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> kernel/irq/proc.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
> +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>
> extern bool noirqdebug;
> extern int irq_poll_cpu;
> +extern unsigned int total_nr_irqs;
>
> extern struct irqaction chained_action;
>
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
> @@ -140,14 +140,14 @@ static void desc_set_defaults(unsigned i
> desc_smp_init(desc, node, affinity);
> }
>
> -static unsigned int nr_irqs = NR_IRQS;
> +unsigned int total_nr_irqs __read_mostly = NR_IRQS;
>
> /**
> * irq_get_nr_irqs() - Number of interrupts supported by the system.
> */
> unsigned int irq_get_nr_irqs(void)
> {
> - return nr_irqs;
> + return total_nr_irqs;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_get_nr_irqs);
>
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_get_nr_irqs);
> */
> unsigned int irq_set_nr_irqs(unsigned int nr)
> {
> - nr_irqs = nr;
> + total_nr_irqs = nr;
>
> return nr;
> }
> @@ -187,9 +187,9 @@ static unsigned int irq_find_at_or_after
> struct irq_desc *desc;
>
> guard(rcu)();
> - desc = mt_find(&sparse_irqs, &index, nr_irqs);
> + desc = mt_find(&sparse_irqs, &index, total_nr_irqs);
>
> - return desc ? irq_desc_get_irq(desc) : nr_irqs;
> + return desc ? irq_desc_get_irq(desc) : total_nr_irqs;
> }
>
> static void irq_insert_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static bool irq_expand_nr_irqs(unsigned
> {
> if (nr > MAX_SPARSE_IRQS)
> return false;
> - nr_irqs = nr;
> + total_nr_irqs = nr;
> return true;
> }
>
> @@ -557,16 +557,16 @@ int __init early_irq_init(void)
> /* Let arch update nr_irqs and return the nr of preallocated irqs */
> initcnt = arch_probe_nr_irqs();
> printk(KERN_INFO "NR_IRQS: %d, nr_irqs: %d, preallocated irqs: %d\n",
> - NR_IRQS, nr_irqs, initcnt);
> + NR_IRQS, total_nr_irqs, initcnt);
>
> - if (WARN_ON(nr_irqs > MAX_SPARSE_IRQS))
> - nr_irqs = MAX_SPARSE_IRQS;
> + if (WARN_ON(total_nr_irqs > MAX_SPARSE_IRQS))
> + total_nr_irqs = MAX_SPARSE_IRQS;
>
> if (WARN_ON(initcnt > MAX_SPARSE_IRQS))
> initcnt = MAX_SPARSE_IRQS;
>
> - if (initcnt > nr_irqs)
> - nr_irqs = initcnt;
> + if (initcnt > total_nr_irqs)
> + total_nr_irqs = initcnt;
>
> for (i = 0; i < initcnt; i++) {
> desc = alloc_desc(i, node, 0, NULL, NULL);
> @@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ void irq_free_descs(unsigned int from, u
> {
> int i;
>
> - if (from >= nr_irqs || (from + cnt) > nr_irqs)
> + if (from >= total_nr_irqs || (from + cnt) > total_nr_irqs)
> return;
>
> guard(mutex)(&sparse_irq_lock);
> @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int __ref __irq_alloc_descs(int irq, uns
> if (irq >=0 && start != irq)
> return -EEXIST;
>
> - if (start + cnt > nr_irqs) {
> + if (start + cnt > total_nr_irqs) {
> if (!irq_expand_nr_irqs(start + cnt))
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__irq_alloc_descs);
> * irq_get_next_irq - get next allocated irq number
> * @offset: where to start the search
> *
> - * Returns next irq number after offset or nr_irqs if none is found.
> + * Returns next irq number after offset or total_nr_irqs if none is found.
> */
> unsigned int irq_get_next_irq(unsigned int offset)
> {
> --- a/kernel/irq/proc.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ int __weak arch_show_interrupts(struct s
> }
>
> #ifndef ACTUAL_NR_IRQS
> -# define ACTUAL_NR_IRQS irq_get_nr_irqs()
> +# define ACTUAL_NR_IRQS total_nr_irqs
> #endif
>
> #define ZSTR1 " 0"
Nit: This is modified again in the next patch, so it doesn't matter.
But for the purpose of this patch in isolation, looking at where
ACTUAL_NR_IRQS is used, in show_interrupts() the nr_irqs variable
should also be initialized to total_nr_irqs to avoid the extra function
call.
Reviewed-by: Radu Rendec <radu@xxxxxxxxxx>