Re: [PATCH] tracing: fprobe: fix the length of unused fgraph_data

[Google]

On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:48:18 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:19:36 +0100
> Martin Kaiser <martin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > If fprobe_entry does not fill the allocated fgraph_data completely, the
> > unused part is zeroed with memset.
> > 
> > Fix the length for this memset call. Both reserved_words and used are in
> > units of return stack words, but memset needs the number of bytes.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fixes: 4346ba160409 ("fprobe: Rewrite fprobe on function-graph tracer")
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > index dcadf1d23b8a..6a1192515afd 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> > @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static int fprobe_fgraph_entry(struct ftrace_graph_ent *trace, struct fgraph_ops
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  	if (used < reserved_words)
> > -		memset(fgraph_data + used, 0, reserved_words - used);
> > +		memset(fgraph_data + used, 0, (reserved_words - used) * sizeof(long));
> 
> So fgraph_data is only used internally between the fprobe_fgraph_entry()
> and fprobe_return() as it only exists on the fgraph shadow stack. I'm not
> even sure if the unused portion needs to be zeroed out.
> 
> Thus, this may be correct, but it doesn't look like a true bug that needs a
> stable tag.

Hmm, indeed. Maybe we'd better just remove this memset from for-next.

Thanks,

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> >  
> >  	/* If any exit_handler is set, data must be used. */
> >  	return used != 0;
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>