Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] net: replace deprecated simple_strto* parsers with kstrto*

[Eric_Terminal]

Hi Simon and maintainers,

Just a gentle ping on this patch series.

Following up on my previous email regarding the testing methodology
(using virtme-ng, verifying the Oops fix in Patch 1, and confirming
the strictness of strsep + kstrtouint).

Does the provided testing information address the concerns? Please let
me know if there's anything else I should clarify, or if a v3 is
needed to move this forward.

Thanks,
Yufan

On Wed, Mar 4, 2026 at 11:28 PM Eric_Terminal <ericterminal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2026 at 11:29 PM Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for your patches.
> >
> > I would like to understand what testing has been performed on these patches.
> >
> > With the possible exception of patch 3/4, I feel that unless they
> > are motivated as bug fixes, these changes are too complex to accept
> > without testing. Although the opinions of the relevant maintainers
> > may differ.
> >
> > And as for 3/4, I lean towards falling into the policy regarding
> > clean-ups not being generally accepted unless it is part of other work.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I've verified the series using virtme-ng and
> a userspace mock harness (for the 9p tokenizing logic).
>
> Regarding Patch 1: This is primarily a stability fix. I've tested the
> error paths by forcing init failures on a non-Xen system; dmesg
> confirms the new sentinel-based cleanup (NULL-ing intf/data and
> checking INVALID_GRANT_REF) correctly prevents double-frees and Oops
> during teardown.
>
> Regarding the "complexity" in Patch 2: The strsep + kstrtouint
> approach was chosen for strictness. I've verified it handles cases
> like "1,,2" (empty tokens) and "1abc" (malformed input) correctly. The
> latter is now rejected with -EINVAL, whereas simple_strto* would have
> silently accepted partial values.
>
> The same applies to Patches 3 and 4. The migration to kstrto* ensures
> that sysfs/procfs interfaces now properly validate the entire input
> string.
>
> P.S. I used a translation tool for the message above, so please excuse
> any awkward wording.
>
> Thanks,