Re: [PATCH 4/4] timers: Get this_cpu once while clearing idle timer

[Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya]

On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 01:06:30AM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Calling smp_processor_id() on:
> - In CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y, if preemption/irq is disabled, then it does
> not print any warning.
> - In CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=n, it doesn't do anything apart from getting
> __smp_processor_id
> 
> So with both CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y/n, in preemption disabled section
> it is better to cache the value. It could save a few cycles. Though
> tiny, repeated could add up to a small value.
> 
> timer_clear_idle is called with interrupts disabled.
> So cache the value once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/time/timer.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
> index 7e1e3bde6b8b..04d928c21aba 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> @@ -2319,6 +2319,7 @@ u64 timer_base_try_to_set_idle(unsigned long basej, u64 basem, bool *idle)
>   */
>  void timer_clear_idle(void)
>  {
> +	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	/*
>  	 * We do this unlocked. The worst outcome is a remote pinned timer
>  	 * enqueue sending a pointless IPI, but taking the lock would just
> @@ -2327,9 +2328,9 @@ void timer_clear_idle(void)
>  	 * path. Required for BASE_LOCAL only.
>  	 */
>  	__this_cpu_write(timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL].is_idle, false);
> -	if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
> +	if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(this_cpu))
>  		__this_cpu_write(timer_bases[BASE_GLOBAL].is_idle, false);
> -	trace_timer_base_idle(false, smp_processor_id());
> +	trace_timer_base_idle(false, this_cpu);
>  
>  	/* Activate without holding the timer_base->lock */
>  	tmigr_cpu_activate();
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 

Reviewed-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) <mkchauras@xxxxxxxxx>