Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add "link bpc" DRM property

[Nicolas Frattaroli]

On Monday, 23 March 2026 18:27:41 Central European Standard Time Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 3/23/26 17:55, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> >
> > "Someone might not understand its purpose" is, in my eyes, not a valid reason to
> > not have this property, [...]
> Per my previous posts, that's not my concern.
> 
> 
> 

Then what is your concern? That the link-bpc property does not
consider DSC and dithering? Two things which the max-bpc property
also does not consider?

Please clearly state where your problem with this property is (and
not with how your understanding of the Weston MR uses it) so that
I can make forward progress here. If all you want is a clearer
description of the property in the comment that accompanies it,
then I can do that, and I said I agree with this point. But you
seem to be arguing from a position of not wanting the property to
exist at all, which is not something I can address. Userspace needs
a way to close the feedback loop here, or it won't be able to make
the right content-specific trade-offs.

Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli