Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/page_alloc: Optimize free_contig_range()
From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Tue Mar 24 2026 - 11:35:14 EST
On 3/24/26 15:46, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2026, at 9:35, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>
>> From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Decompose the range of order-0 pages to be freed into the set of largest
>> possible power-of-2 size and aligned chunks and free them to the pcp or
>> buddy. This improves on the previous approach which freed each order-0
>> page individually in a loop. Testing shows performance to be improved by
>> more than 10x in some cases.
>>
>> Since each page is order-0, we must decrement each page's reference
>> count individually and only consider the page for freeing as part of a
>> high order chunk if the reference count goes to zero. Additionally
>> free_pages_prepare() must be called for each individual order-0 page
>> too, so that the struct page state and global accounting state can be
>> appropriately managed. But once this is done, the resulting high order
>> chunks can be freed as a unit to the pcp or buddy.
>>
>> This significantly speeds up the free operation but also has the side
>> benefit that high order blocks are added to the pcp instead of each page
>> ending up on the pcp order-0 list; memory remains more readily available
>> in high orders.
>>
>> vmalloc will shortly become a user of this new optimized
>> free_contig_range() since it aggressively allocates high order
>> non-compound pages, but then calls split_page() to end up with
>> contiguous order-0 pages. These can now be freed much more efficiently.
>>
>> The execution time of the following function was measured in a server
>> class arm64 machine:
>>
>> static int page_alloc_high_order_test(void)
>> {
>> unsigned int order = HPAGE_PMD_ORDER;
>> struct page *page;
>> int i;
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
>> page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, order);
>> if (!page)
>> return -1;
>> split_page(page, order);
>> free_contig_range(page_to_pfn(page), 1UL << order);
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> Execution time before: 4097358 usec
>> Execution time after: 729831 usec
>>
>> Perf trace before:
>>
>> 99.63% 0.00% kthreadd [kernel.kallsyms] [.] kthread
>> |
>> ---kthread
>> 0xffffb33c12a26af8
>> |
>> |--98.13%--0xffffb33c12a26060
>> | |
>> | |--97.37%--free_contig_range
>> | | |
>> | | |--94.93%--___free_pages
>> | | | |
>> | | | |--55.42%--__free_frozen_pages
>> | | | | |
>> | | | | --43.20%--free_frozen_page_commit
>> | | | | |
>> | | | | --35.37%--_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
>> | | | |
>> | | | |--11.53%--_raw_spin_trylock
>> | | | |
>> | | | |--8.19%--__preempt_count_dec_and_test
>> | | | |
>> | | | |--5.64%--_raw_spin_unlock
>> | | | |
>> | | | |--2.37%--__get_pfnblock_flags_mask.isra.0
>> | | | |
>> | | | --1.07%--free_frozen_page_commit
>> | | |
>> | | --1.54%--__free_frozen_pages
>> | |
>> | --0.77%--___free_pages
>> |
>> --0.98%--0xffffb33c12a26078
>> alloc_pages_noprof
>>
>> Perf trace after:
>>
>> 8.42% 2.90% kthreadd [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __free_contig_range
>> |
>> |--5.52%--__free_contig_range
>> | |
>> | |--5.00%--free_prepared_contig_range
>> | | |
>> | | |--1.43%--__free_frozen_pages
>> | | | |
>> | | | --0.51%--free_frozen_page_commit
>> | | |
>> | | |--1.08%--_raw_spin_trylock
>> | | |
>> | | --0.89%--_raw_spin_unlock
>> | |
>> | --0.52%--free_pages_prepare
>> |
>> --2.90%--ret_from_fork
>> kthread
>> 0xffffae1c12abeaf8
>> 0xffffae1c12abe7a0
>> |
>> --2.69%--vfree
>> __free_contig_range
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
>> Co-developed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Handle different possible section boundries in __free_contig_range()
>> - Drop the TODO
>> - Remove return value from __free_contig_range()
>> - Remove non-functional change from __free_pages_ok()
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Rebase on mm-new
>> - Move FPI_PREPARED check inside __free_pages_prepare() now that
>> fpi_flags are already being passed.
>> - Add todo (Zi Yan)
>> - Rerun benchmarks
>> - Convert VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() to VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()
>> - Rework order calculation in free_prepared_contig_range() and use
>> MAX_PAGE_ORDER as high limit instead of pageblock_order as it must
>> be up to internal __free_frozen_pages() how it frees them
>>
>> Made-with: Cursor
>> ---
>> include/linux/gfp.h | 2 +
>> mm/page_alloc.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * __free_contig_range - Free contiguous range of order-0 pages.
>> + * @pfn: Page frame number of the first page in the range.
>> + * @nr_pages: Number of pages to free.
>> + *
>> + * For each order-0 struct page in the physically contiguous range, put a
>> + * reference. Free any page who's reference count falls to zero. The
>> + * implementation is functionally equivalent to, but significantly faster than
>> + * calling __free_page() for each struct page in a loop.
>> + *
>> + * Memory allocated with alloc_pages(order>=1) then subsequently split to
>> + * order-0 with split_page() is an example of appropriate contiguous pages that
>> + * can be freed with this API.
>> + *
>> + * Context: May be called in interrupt context or while holding a normal
>> + * spinlock, but not in NMI context or while holding a raw spinlock.
>> + */
>> +void __free_contig_range(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
>> +{
>> + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> + struct page *start = NULL;
>> + unsigned long start_sec;
>> + unsigned long i;
>> + bool can_free;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Chunk the range into contiguous runs of pages for which the refcount
>> + * went to zero and for which free_pages_prepare() succeeded. If
>> + * free_pages_prepare() fails we consider the page to have been freed;
>> + * deliberately leak it.
>> + *
>> + * Code assumes contiguous PFNs have contiguous struct pages, but not
>> + * vice versa. Break batches at section boundaries since pages from
>> + * different sections must not be coalesced into a single high-order
>> + * block.
>> + */
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++, page++) {
>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(PageHead(page));
>> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(PageTail(page));
>> +
>> + can_free = put_page_testzero(page);
>> + if (can_free && !free_pages_prepare(page, 0))
>> + can_free = false;
>> +
>> + if (can_free && start &&
>> + memdesc_section(page->flags) != start_sec) {
>> + free_prepared_contig_range(start, page - start);
>> + start = page;
>> + start_sec = memdesc_section(page->flags);
>> + } else if (!can_free && start) {
>> + free_prepared_contig_range(start, page - start);
>> + start = NULL;
>> + } else if (can_free && !start) {
>> + start = page;
>> + start_sec = memdesc_section(page->flags);
>> + }
>> + }
>
> It can be simplified to:
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++, page++) {
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(PageHead(page));
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(PageTail(page));
>
> can_free = put_page_testzero(page) && free_pages_prepare(page, 0);
>
> if (!can_free) {
> if (start) {
> free_prepared_contig_range(start, page - start);
> start = NULL;
> }
> continue;
> }
>
> if (start && memdesc_section(page->flags) != start_sec) {
> free_prepared_contig_range(start, page - start);
> start = page;
> start_sec = memdesc_section(page->flags);
> } else if (!start) {
> start = page;
> start_sec = memdesc_section(page->flags);
> }
> }
>
> BTW, memdesc_section() returns 0 for !SECTION_IN_PAGE_FLAGS.
> Is pfn_to_section_nr() more robust?
That's the whole trick: it's optimized out in that case. Linus proposed
that for num_pages_contiguous().
The cover letter should likely refer to num_pages_contiguous() :)
--
Cheers,
David