Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] cpupower-frequency-info.1: use the proper name of the --perf option

[Shuah Khan]

On 3/24/26 16:39, Roberto Ricci wrote:
> The cpupower-frequency-info(1) man page describes a '--perf' option.
> Even though this form is accepted by the program, its proper name is
> '--performance'.
>
> cpufreq-info.c:
> 	{"performance", no_argument,	 NULL,	 'c'},
>
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Ricci <io@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1 | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1 b/tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1
> index 47fdd7218748..1173d4f31e69 100644
> --- a/tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1
> +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/man/cpupower-frequency-info.1
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ human\-readable output for the \-f, \-w, \-s and \-y parameters.
>   \fB\-n\fR \fB\-\-no-rounding\fR
>   Output frequencies and latencies without rounding off values.
>   .TP
> -\fB\-c\fR \fB\-\-perf\fR
> +\fB\-c\fR \fB\-\-performance\fR

I would keep perf and also add performance since --perf and --performance
work - it is lot easier to type --perf

>   Get performances and frequencies capabilities of CPPC, by reading it from hardware (only available on the hardware with CPPC).
>   .TP
>   .SH "REMARKS"

thanks,
-- Shuah