Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] pinctrl: eyeq5: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus OLB

[Benoît Monin]

On Tuesday, 24 March 2026 at 15:04:03 CET, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 4:26 PM Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Add the match data for the pinctrl found in the EyeQ6Lplus OLB. The pin
> > > control is identical in function to the one present in the EyeQ5 but
> > > has a single bank of 32 pins.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I don't know your merge strategy for this patch series, if you want part
> > of it applied to the pinctrl tree then tell me which patches and how.
> 
> as there are also MIPS parts involved and Stephen Acked the clk Patches
> it might be best to merge via MIPS tree
> 
> Thomas.
> 
> 
I proposed to Stephen to take the patches related to the OLB (clk,
pinctrl and reset) in the clk tree[1]. The following patches could go
through the mips tree:

      [PATCH v4 01/13] dt-bindings: mips: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus SoC
      [PATCH v4 02/13] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: Add EyeQ6Lplus OLB
      [PATCH v4 03/13] MIPS: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus support
      [PATCH v4 10/13] MIPS: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus SoC dtsi
      [PATCH v4 11/13] MIPS: Add Mobileye EyeQ6Lplus evaluation board dts
      [PATCH v4 12/13] MIPS: config: add eyeq6lplus_defconfig
      [PATCH v4 13/13] MAINTAINERS: Mobileye: Add EyeQ6Lplus files

For the two sets of patches to build properly, the OLB dt-bindings patch
(patch 02/13) is present in both as the clk-eyeq driver and the SoC
device tree use the header introduced in it. I don't know if having a
patch in two trees is a valid merge strategy. Any opinion on that?


[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2786053.vuYhMxLoTh@benoit.monin/


Best regards,
-- 
Benoît Monin, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com