Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm: add vma_desc_test_all() and use it
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed Mar 25 2026 - 10:46:05 EST
On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 07:08:22 +0000 "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 04:12:12PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:50:15 +0000 "Lorenzo Stoakes (Oracle)" <ljs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > erofs and zonefs are using vma_desc_test_any() twice to check whether all
> > > of VMA_SHARED_BIT and VMA_MAYWRITE_BIT are set, this is silly, so add
> > > vma_desc_test_all() to test all flags and update erofs and zonefs to use
> > > it.
> > >
> > > While we're here, update the helper function comments to be more
> > > consistent.
> > >
> > > Also add the same to the VMA test headers.
> >
> > fwiw, we have no review tags on this one.
>
> Based on the discussion we had about this previously I was under the impression
> if submitted by a maintainer that wasn't required?
Well, it's a gray area. Obviously it's better if people's stuff is
checked by co-maintainers or by others.
I'm not inclined to make a fuss about it though (hence "fwiw"). Quite
a lot of unreviewed maintainer-authored material ends up going upstream
and I don't think that's causing much harm.
In a lot of cases this is pretty much unavoidable because the patch
comes from a sole maintainer (SJ, Sergey, Ulad, Liam come to mind).
But when the author has co-maintainers, perhaps those people could step
up.
> I'll nag people, but I'm a bit surprised if this is why you haven't moved this
> to mm-stable, given how trivially obviously correct this patch is.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/pc/devel-series
shows my expected merging order. It looks like this one will be in the
next batch ->mm-stable.