Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fall back to using software node name as LED name

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 25 Mar 2026, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 01:38:36PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Mar 2026, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > 
> > > This allows setting just name in software node representing an LED
> > > instance and forego "label" or other properties needed to form a name.
> > > This is helpful when converting old boards using bespoke platform data
> > > to software nodes/static device properties.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Dmitry Torokhov (2):
> > >       leds: core: implement fallback to software node name for LED names
> > >       leds: core: fix formatting issues
> > > 
> > >  drivers/leds/led-core.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > ---
> > > base-commit: 7109a2155340cc7b21f27e832ece6df03592f2e8
> > > change-id: 20260311-led-swnode-name-6db2e5757071
> > 
> > I'm happy with the set, but it failed to apply to leds-next.
> > 
> > diff a/drivers/leds/led-core.c b/drivers/leds/led-core.c        (rejected hunks)
> > @@ -584,8 +582,9 @@ int led_compose_name(struct device *dev, struct led_init_data *init_data,
> >         } else if (is_software_node(fwnode)) {
> >                 n = snprintf(led_classdev_name, LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE, "%s",
> >                              fwnode_get_name(fwnode));
> > -       } else
> > +       } else {
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> >  
> >         if (n >= LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE)
> >                 return -E2BIG;
> > 
> > Please rebase and [RESEND].
> 
> Do you have something that is not yet pushed out? I see "for-leds-next"
> updated 6 days ago and the rest of branches even older. I tried rebasing
> on top of next-20260324 (latest) and there were no changes...

Must have been a tooling (or my fat-fingers) error.

Applied fine now.  Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]