Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/shrinker: Fix can_block() logic
From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Thu Mar 26 2026 - 06:40:02 EST
On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 11:41:05 -0700
Rob Clark <robin.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The intention here was to allow blocking if DIRECT_RECLAIM or if called
> from kswapd and KSWAPD_RECLAIM is set.
>
> Reported by Claude code review: https://lore.gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm-ai-reviews/review-patch9-20260309151119.290217-10-boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ on a panthor patch which had copied similar logic.
>
> Reported-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 7860d720a84c ("drm/msm: Fix build break with recent mm tree")
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robin.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
> index 1039e3c0a47b..31fa51a44f86 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,8 @@ static bool can_swap(void)
>
> static bool can_block(struct shrink_control *sc)
> {
> - if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
> - return false;
> - return current_is_kswapd() || (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_RECLAIM);
> + return (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) ||
> + (current_is_kswapd() && (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM));
> }
>
> static unsigned long