[PATCH v3 11/11] ext4: zero post-EOF partial block before appending write

From: Zhang Yi

Date: Thu Mar 26 2026 - 07:35:13 EST


From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>

In cases of appending write beyond EOF, ext4_zero_partial_blocks() is
called within ext4_*_write_end() to zero out the partial block beyond
EOF. This prevents exposing stale data that might be written through
mmap.

However, supporting only the regular buffered write path is
insufficient. It is also necessary to support the DAX path as well as
the upcoming iomap buffered write path. Therefore, move this operation
to ext4_write_checks().

In addition, this may introduce a race window in which a post-EOF
buffered write can race with an mmap write after the old EOF block has
been zeroed. As a result, the data in this block written by the
buffer-write and the data written by the mmap-write may be mixed.
However, this is safe because users should not rely on the result of the
race condition.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/file.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
fs/ext4/inode.c | 21 +++++++--------------
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
index f1dc5ce791a7..ec0d81bea07a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
@@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ static ssize_t ext4_generic_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb,

static ssize_t ext4_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
{
+ struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
+ loff_t old_size = i_size_read(inode);
ssize_t ret, count;

count = ext4_generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
@@ -280,6 +282,21 @@ static ssize_t ext4_write_checks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
ret = file_modified(iocb->ki_filp);
if (ret)
return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * If the position is beyond the EOF, it is necessary to zero out the
+ * partial block that beyond the existing EOF, as it may contains
+ * stale data written through mmap.
+ */
+ if (iocb->ki_pos > old_size && !ext4_verity_in_progress(inode)) {
+ if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+
+ ret = ext4_block_zero_eof(inode, old_size, iocb->ki_pos);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
return count;
}

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 5c54d5c6fdfe..d52cffdea635 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1456,10 +1456,9 @@ static int ext4_write_end(const struct kiocb *iocb,
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);

- if (old_size < pos && !verity) {
+ if (old_size < pos && !verity)
pagecache_isize_extended(inode, old_size, pos);
- ext4_block_zero_eof(inode, old_size, pos);
- }
+
/*
* Don't mark the inode dirty under folio lock. First, it unnecessarily
* makes the holding time of folio lock longer. Second, it forces lock
@@ -1574,10 +1573,8 @@ static int ext4_journalled_write_end(const struct kiocb *iocb,
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);

- if (old_size < pos && !verity) {
+ if (old_size < pos && !verity)
pagecache_isize_extended(inode, old_size, pos);
- ext4_block_zero_eof(inode, old_size, pos);
- }

if (size_changed) {
ret2 = ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
@@ -3196,7 +3193,7 @@ static int ext4_da_do_write_end(struct address_space *mapping,
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
loff_t old_size = inode->i_size;
bool disksize_changed = false;
- loff_t new_i_size, zero_len = 0;
+ loff_t new_i_size;
handle_t *handle;

if (unlikely(!folio_buffers(folio))) {
@@ -3240,19 +3237,15 @@ static int ext4_da_do_write_end(struct address_space *mapping,
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);

- if (pos > old_size) {
+ if (pos > old_size)
pagecache_isize_extended(inode, old_size, pos);
- zero_len = pos - old_size;
- }

- if (!disksize_changed && !zero_len)
+ if (!disksize_changed)
return copied;

- handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, EXT4_HT_INODE, 2);
+ handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, EXT4_HT_INODE, 1);
if (IS_ERR(handle))
return PTR_ERR(handle);
- if (zero_len)
- ext4_block_zero_eof(inode, old_size, pos);
ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
ext4_journal_stop(handle);

--
2.52.0