Re: [PATCH] fuse: fix inode initialization race

[Christian Brauner]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 08:54:57AM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/18/26 14:43, Horst Birthelmer wrote:
> > From: Horst Birthelmer <hbirthelmer@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Fix a race between fuse_iget() and fuse_reverse_inval_inode() where
> > invalidation can arrive while an inode is being initialized, causing
> > the invalidation to be lost.
> > 
> > Add a waitqueue to make fuse_reverse_inval_inode() wait when it
> > encounters an inode with attr_version == 0 (still initializing).
> > When fuse_change_attributes_common() completes initialization, it
> > wakes waiting threads.
> > 
> > This ensures invalidations are properly serialized with inode
> > initialization, maintaining cache coherency.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Horst Birthelmer <hbirthelmer@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 3 +++
> >  fs/fuse/inode.c  | 8 ++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> > index 7f16049387d15e869db4be23a93605098588eda9..1be611472eee276371b3bde1a55257c1116cfedd 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
> > @@ -945,6 +945,9 @@ struct fuse_conn {
> >  	/** Version counter for attribute changes */
> >  	atomic64_t attr_version;
> >  
> > +	/** Waitqueue for attr_version initialization */
> > +	wait_queue_head_t attr_version_waitq;
> > +
> >  	/** Version counter for evict inode */
> >  	atomic64_t evict_ctr;
> >  
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> > index e57b8af06be93ecc29c58864a9c9e99c68e3283b..c6e7e50d80c0edaea57d9342869eaf811786e342 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> > @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ void fuse_change_attributes_common(struct inode *inode, struct fuse_attr *attr,
> >  		set_mask_bits(&fi->inval_mask, STATX_BASIC_STATS, 0);
> >  
> >  	fi->attr_version = atomic64_inc_return(&fc->attr_version);
> > +	wake_up_all(&fc->attr_version_waitq);
> >  	fi->i_time = attr_valid;
> >  
> >  	inode->i_ino     = fuse_squash_ino(attr->ino);
> > @@ -567,6 +568,12 @@ int fuse_reverse_inval_inode(struct fuse_conn *fc, u64 nodeid,
> >  
> >  	fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> >  	spin_lock(&fi->lock);
> > +	while (fi->attr_version == 0) {
> > +		spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
> > +		wait_event(fc->attr_version_waitq, READ_ONCE(fi->attr_version) != 0);
> > +		spin_lock(&fi->lock);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	fi->attr_version = atomic64_inc_return(&fc->attr_version);
> >  	spin_unlock(&fi->lock);
> >  
> > @@ -979,6 +986,7 @@ void fuse_conn_init(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_mount *fm,
> >  	atomic_set(&fc->epoch, 1);
> >  	INIT_WORK(&fc->epoch_work, fuse_epoch_work);
> >  	init_waitqueue_head(&fc->blocked_waitq);
> > +	init_waitqueue_head(&fc->attr_version_waitq);
> >  	fuse_iqueue_init(&fc->iq, fiq_ops, fiq_priv);
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->bg_queue);
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fc->entry);
> > 
> > ---
> > base-commit: f338e77383789c0cae23ca3d48adcc5e9e137e3c
> > change-id: 20260318-fix-inode-init-race-a47a7ba4af1e
> > 
> > Best regards,
> 
> Had reviewed that DDN internally already. LGTM
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bernd Schubert <bernd@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Should I grab it?