RE: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btintel_pcie: validate completion ring indices

From: K, Kiran

Date: Fri Mar 27 2026 - 08:59:45 EST


Hi Luiz, Pengpeng,

>Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btintel_pcie: validate completion ring indices
>
>Hi @Kiran K
>
>On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 4:51 AM Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>>
>> The MSI-X RX and TX completion handlers trust the shared ring indices
>> read from data->ia.cr_tia[] and data->ia.cr_hia[] before using cr_tia
>> as an index into the fixed urbd ring arrays. If the device reports a
>> stale or malformed completion index, the driver can step past
>> rxq->urbd1s[] or
>> txq->urbd0s[] before it gets a chance to recover.
>>
>> Validate both completion ring indices against the queue depth before
>> walking the descriptor arrays.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
>> b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
>> index 37b744e35bc4..06c2b81f2b6e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel_pcie.c
>> @@ -1008,6 +1008,13 @@ static void btintel_pcie_msix_tx_handle(struct
>> btintel_pcie_data *data)
>>
>> txq = &data->txq;
>>
>> + if (cr_tia >= txq->count || cr_hia >= txq->count) {
>> + bt_dev_err(data->hdev,
>> + "TXQ: invalid ring indices tia=%u hia=%u",
>> + cr_tia, cr_hia);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> while (cr_tia != cr_hia) {
>> data->tx_wait_done = true;
>> wake_up(&data->tx_wait_q); @@ -1403,6 +1410,12 @@
>> static void btintel_pcie_msix_rx_handle(struct btintel_pcie_data
>> *data)
>>
>> rxq = &data->rxq;
>>
>> + if (cr_tia >= rxq->count || cr_hia >= rxq->count) {
>> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "RXQ: invalid ring indices tia=%u hia=%u",
>> + cr_tia, cr_hia);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* The firmware sends multiple CD in a single MSI-X and it needs to
>> * process all received CDs in this interrupt.
>> */
>> --
>> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>
>Can you review these changes?
>
Looks good to me.

Tested-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Kiran