Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property

Next message: Brian Masney: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: move core flags into a new enum for kernel docs"
Previous message: Cen Zhang: "[PATCH] xfs: annotate lockless bli_flags access in buf item paths"
In reply to: Abel Vesa: "[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property"
Next in thread: Abel Vesa: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Date: Fri Mar 27 2026 - 09:40:03 EST

On 27/03/2026 13:13, Abel Vesa wrote:
> In order for the GCC votes on the GDSCs it provides to be propagated
> to CX, CX needs to be declared as power domain of the GCC.

I assume this is true for Milos, not only Eliza.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards,
Krzysztof