Re: [PATCH v2] enclosure: bound sysfs link name construction

From: Pengpeng Hou

Date: Sun Mar 29 2026 - 04:07:20 EST


Hi Greg,

You are right, I misread your previous review.

I took "how about just sending this portion" to mean I should keep only
the bounded-formatting part and drop the extra error propagation, but
reading your comments together now, I see that you were questioning
whether the overflow path can happen at all and were not asking for
that respin.

I should not have sent the v2 in that form.

I'll stop here rather than resend another version unless I can first
explain the trigger and align the exact patch scope.

Thanks,
Pengpeng