Re: [PATCH v2] enclosure: bound sysfs link name construction
From: Pengpeng Hou
Date: Sun Mar 29 2026 - 04:07:20 EST
Hi Greg,
You are right, I misread your previous review.
I took "how about just sending this portion" to mean I should keep only
the bounded-formatting part and drop the extra error propagation, but
reading your comments together now, I see that you were questioning
whether the overflow path can happen at all and were not asking for
that respin.
I should not have sent the v2 in that form.
I'll stop here rather than resend another version unless I can first
explain the trigger and align the exact patch scope.
Thanks,
Pengpeng