Re: [RFT PATCH v3] ARM: omap1: enable real software node lookup of GPIOs on Nokia 770

[Andy Shevchenko]

+Cc: Heikki, the author of the code in question.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 06:23:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 5:59 PM Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 03:22:12PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > Hmm, I'm wondering if there's a race with consumers already requesting
> > > the GPIOs after the controller device is registered but before the
> > > software node is added. I'll send a version with software nodes being
> > > registered first, then passes as firmware nodes to the platform device
> > > API before the device is registered.
> >
> > It crashes early, I was able to get an UART log from OSK (another
> > 16xx board):
> >
> > [    1.001525] Register r12 information: 2-page vmalloc region starting at 0xc2808000 allocated at kernel_clone+0xa4/0x20c
> > [    1.013092] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, stack limit = 0x(ptrval))
> > [    1.019500] Stack: (0xc2809ed0 to 0xc280a000)
> > [    1.024230] 9ec0:                                     c072d000 c0529474 c06b3aa0 c050a3cc
> > [    1.032958] 9ee0: c072d000 c085c000 00000002 c052582c c050a324 c072d000 00000000 c0503160
> > [    1.041687] 9f00: 00002710 00000000 c04da8f8 c0060900 c2809f64 ffffffff 00010000 946f70b5
> > [    1.050384] 9f20: 00000062 c0816120 00000002 c052582c c0525848 c072d000 c04da8f8 c0060a18
> > [    1.059112] 9f40: c2809f64 c2809f64 00000000 946f70b5 00000062 c0816120 00000002 c052582c
> > [    1.067810] 9f60: c052584c c072d000 c04da8f8 c050352c 00000002 00000002 00000000 c0502400
> > [    1.076507] 9f80: c2809f7c 00000000 c03f86f4 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [    1.085205] 9fa0: 00000000 c03f8704 00000000 c000850c 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [    1.093902] 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [    1.102600] 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [    1.111206] Call trace:
> > [    1.111328]  software_node_to_swnode from device_add_software_node+0x20/0x80
> > [    1.121704]  device_add_software_node from omap16xx_gpio_init+0xa8/0xe4
> > [    1.128997]  omap16xx_gpio_init from do_one_initcall+0x68/0x1f4
> > [    1.135620]  do_one_initcall from kernel_init_freeable+0x1ec/0x240
> > [    1.142517]  kernel_init_freeable from kernel_init+0x10/0x108
> > [    1.148864]  kernel_init from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28
> > [    1.154357] Exception stack(0xc2809fb0 to 0xc2809ff8)
> > [    1.159820] 9fa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [    1.168518] 9fc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > [    1.177185] 9fe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
> > [    1.184295] Code: e3500000 012fff1e e59f3034 e5932000 (e5923000)
> > [    1.191040] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > [    1.196350] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b
> > [    1.204559] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b ]---
> 
> Thanks. This makes sense. Both omap16xx_gpio_init() and
> software_node_init() run as postcore_initcall() so if the order is not
> right, it will fail.
> 
> Cc'ing Andy who's a reviewer for software nodes. Andy: is there any
> reason to run software_node_init() as a postcore initcall? It only
> allocates the kset, can we move it to core_initcall() by any chance?

Good question. I don't know why it's chosen like this.
Let ask Heikki, who is the author of the code.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko