Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 3/27/26 2:45 PM, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 26-03-27 14:37:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/03/2026 13:13, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>> In order for the GCC votes on the GDSCs it provides to be propagated
>>> to CX, CX needs to be declared as power domain of the GCC.
>>
>> I assume this is true for Milos, not only Eliza.
> 
> My understanding of it is that this is true for all platforms.

I think we once had

required:
  - power-domains

in some common include, but that expectation fell apart as IPQ/router
platforms without RPM/RPMH started coming up. Maybe splitting gcc.yaml
into gcc.yaml and gcc-no-rpm.yaml or something could be useful to ensure
this common constraint

Konrad