Re: [PATCH v8 04/10] dt-bindings: soc: google: gs101-pmu: allow power domains as children

[André Draszik]

On Sat, 2026-03-21 at 20:14 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> This causes warnings, so I dropped the patches.

I assume warnings are because I didn't make it clear enough that patch
2 is actually required?

> I really do not
> understand how this is organized. This is not a dependency for pm
> domains driver but it is included here.

The binding is being updated, and the driver follows suit. 
I particular, the driver needs to be aware that pd is (can be) a child
of pmu.

Yes, the driver does not depend on this binding update, but it shows what
the driver must support. I believe this is what we have done in the past:
binding and driver updates in same series.

I could move patches 3 and 4 from this series together with a DTS
update patch into a separate series, if that would be deemed a better
approach?

> It is a soft dependency for DTS,
> but that is nowhere to be found.

I was waiting for review of all binding changes before posting DTS.

Cheers,
Andre'