Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] ufs: host: Add ICE clock scaling during UFS clock changes

From: Harshal Dev

Date: Mon Mar 30 2026 - 10:50:47 EST


Hi Abhinaba,

On 3/2/2026 4:19 PM, Abhinaba Rakshit wrote:
> Implement ICE (Inline Crypto Engine) clock scaling in sync with
> UFS controller clock scaling. This ensures that the ICE operates at
> an appropriate frequency when the UFS clocks are scaled up or down,
> improving performance and maintaining stability for crypto operations.
>
> For scale_up operation ensure to pass ~round_ceil (round_floor)
> and vice-versa for scale_down operations.
>
> Incase of OPP scaling is not supported by ICE, ensure to not prevent
> devfreq for UFS, as ICE OPP-table is optional.
>
> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinaba Rakshit <abhinaba.rakshit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 8d119b3223cbdaa3297d2beabced0962a1a847d5..776444f46fe5f00f947e4b0b4dfe6d64e2ad2150 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,15 @@ static int ufs_qcom_ice_prepare_key(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile,
> return qcom_ice_prepare_key(host->ice, lt_key, lt_key_size, eph_key);
> }
>
> +static int ufs_qcom_ice_scale_clk(struct ufs_qcom_host *host, unsigned long target_freq,
> + bool round_ceil)
> +{
> + if (host->hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO)
> + return qcom_ice_scale_clk(host->ice, target_freq, round_ceil);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct blk_crypto_ll_ops ufs_qcom_crypto_ops = {
> .keyslot_program = ufs_qcom_ice_keyslot_program,
> .keyslot_evict = ufs_qcom_ice_keyslot_evict,
> @@ -339,6 +348,12 @@ static void ufs_qcom_config_ice_allocator(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
> {
> }
>
> +static int ufs_qcom_ice_scale_clk(struct ufs_qcom_host *host, unsigned long target_freq,
> + bool round_ceil)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #endif
>
> static void ufs_qcom_disable_lane_clks(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
> @@ -1646,8 +1661,10 @@ static int ufs_qcom_clk_scale_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up,
> else
> err = ufs_qcom_clk_scale_down_post_change(hba, target_freq);
>
> + if (!err)
> + err = ufs_qcom_ice_scale_clk(host, target_freq, !scale_up);
>
> - if (err) {
> + if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP) {

Using -EOPNOTSUPP here works fine for now. But anyone touching any of the lower APIs called by
ufs_qcom_clk_scale_up/down_post_change() needs to ensure they don't return -EOPNOTSUPP, otherwise
hibernate exit will be skipped. So this carries a minor risk of breaking.

Since regardless of whether ufs_qcom_clk_scale_up/down_post_change() fails or ufs_qcom_ice_scale_clk()
fails, we exit from hibernate and return from this function, I suggest you handle the error for ice_scale
separately.

> ufshcd_uic_hibern8_exit(hba);
> return err;
> }
>

Add the call to ufs_qcom_ice_scale_clk() along with error handle here, and let the above error handle
remain untouched.

err = ufs_qcom_ice_scale_clk(host, target_freq, !scale_up);
if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
ufshcd_uic_hibern8_exit(hba);
return err;
}

Regards,
Harshal