[PATCH] [PATCH v2] erofs: fix missing folio_unlock causing lock imbalance
From: Zhan Xusheng
Date: Mon Mar 30 2026 - 23:47:19 EST
folio_trylock() in erofs_try_to_free_all_cached_folios() may
successfully acquire the folio lock, but the subsequent check
for erofs_folio_is_managed() can skip unlocking when the folio
is not managed by EROFS.
As Gao Xiang pointed out, this condition should not happen in
practice because compressed_bvecs[] only holds valid cached folios
at this point — any non-managed folio would have already been
detached by z_erofs_cache_release_folio() under folio lock.
Fix this by adding DBG_BUGON() to catch unexpected folios
and ensure folio_unlock() is always called.
Suggested-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/erofs/zdata.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
index fe8121df9ef2..b566996a0d1a 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
@@ -605,8 +605,7 @@ static int erofs_try_to_free_all_cached_folios(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
if (!folio_trylock(folio))
return -EBUSY;
- if (!erofs_folio_is_managed(sbi, folio))
- continue;
+ DBG_BUGON(!erofs_folio_is_managed(sbi, folio));
pcl->compressed_bvecs[i].page = NULL;
folio_detach_private(folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
--
2.43.0