Re: [PATCH v2] pseries/kexec: skip resetting CPUs added by firmware but not started by the kernel

[Srikar Dronamraju]

* Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2026-03-30 11:52:06]:

> During DLPAR operations, the newly added CPUs start in halted mode.
> The kernel then takes some time to initialize those CPUs internally and
> start them using the "start-cpu" RTAS call. However, if a kexec crash
> occurs in this window (before the new CPU has been initialized),
> the kexec NMI will try to reset all other CPUs from the crashing CPU.
> This leads to firmware starting the uninitialized CPUs as well.

What would happen if an non kexec crash nmi was delivered when we did a
DLPAR operation and before the CPUs are initialized?

> 
> This can cause the kdump kernel to hang during bring-up.
> 
> Sample Log:
>   [175993.028231][ T1502] NIP [00007fffb953f394] 0x7fffb953f394
>   [175993.028314][ T1502] LR [00007fffb953f394] 0x7fffb953f394
>   [175993.028390][ T1502] --- interrupt: 3000
>   [    5.519483][    T1] Processor 0 is stuck.
>   [   11.089481][    T1] Processor 1 is stuck.
> 
> To fix this, only issue the system-reset hcall to CPUs that have
> actually been started by the kernel.
> 
> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Nysal Jan K.A. <nysal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changelog:
> 
> V2:
>   * added set_crash_nmi_ipi to saperate crash's case from other nmi_ipi
>     users
> 
> V1:
>   * https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251205142825.44698-1-shivangu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h       |  1 +
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c            |  1 +
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> index e41b9ea42122..cb74201f5674 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct smp_ops_t {
>  	void  (*cause_ipi)(int cpu);
>  #endif
>  	int   (*cause_nmi_ipi)(int cpu);
> +	void  (*set_crash_nmi_ipi)(void);
>  	void  (*probe)(void);
>  	int   (*kick_cpu)(int nr);
>  	int   (*prepare_cpu)(int nr);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 3467f86fd78f..3390ee8adf79 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ void crash_send_ipi(void (*crash_ipi_callback)(struct pt_regs *))
>  {
>  	int cpu;
>  
> +	smp_ops->set_crash_nmi_ipi();

Shouldn't we be checking got smp_ops->set_crash_nmi_ipi being non-NULL
before calling. Dont we expect set_crash_nmi_ipi() to be NULL in PowerNV
after this patch? Or what would happen if set_crash_nmi_ipi() was called in
PowerNV code?

>  	smp_send_nmi_ipi(NMI_IPI_ALL_OTHERS, crash_ipi_callback, 1000000);
>  	if (kdump_in_progress() && crash_wake_offline) {
>  		for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
> index db99725e752b..c6c2baacca9a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@
>   */
>  static cpumask_var_t of_spin_mask;
>  
> +

Nit: Are we adding an unnecessary newline?

> +static int crash_nmi_ipi;
> +
>  /* Query where a cpu is now.  Return codes #defined in plpar_wrappers.h */
>  int smp_query_cpu_stopped(unsigned int pcpu)
>  {
> @@ -171,12 +174,35 @@ static void dbell_or_ic_cause_ipi(int cpu)
>  	ic_cause_ipi(cpu);
>  }
>  
> +static void pseries_set_crash_nmi_ipi(void)
> +{
> +	crash_nmi_ipi = 1;
> +}
> +
>  static int pseries_cause_nmi_ipi(int cpu)
>  {
>  	int hwcpu;
> +	int k, curcpu;
>  
> +	curcpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	if (cpu == NMI_IPI_ALL_OTHERS) {
> -		hwcpu = H_SIGNAL_SYS_RESET_ALL_OTHERS;
> +		if (crash_nmi_ipi) {
> +			for_each_present_cpu(k) {
> +				if (k != curcpu) {
> +					hwcpu = get_hard_smp_processor_id(k);
> +
> +					/* it is possible that cpu is present,
> +					 * but not started yet.
> +					 */
> +
> +					if (paca_ptrs[hwcpu]->cpu_start == 1) {
> +						plpar_signal_sys_reset(hwcpu);
> +					}
> +				}
> +			}
> +			return 1;
> +		} else
> +			hwcpu = H_SIGNAL_SYS_RESET_ALL_OTHERS;
>  	} else {
>  		if (cpu < 0) {
>  			WARN_ONCE(true, "incorrect cpu parameter %d", cpu);
> @@ -243,6 +269,7 @@ static struct smp_ops_t pseries_smp_ops = {
>  	.message_pass	= NULL,	/* Use smp_muxed_ipi_message_pass */
>  	.cause_ipi	= NULL,	/* Filled at runtime by pSeries_smp_probe() */
>  	.cause_nmi_ipi	= pseries_cause_nmi_ipi,
> +	.set_crash_nmi_ipi = pseries_set_crash_nmi_ipi,
>  	.probe		= pSeries_smp_probe,
>  	.prepare_cpu	= pseries_smp_prepare_cpu,
>  	.kick_cpu	= smp_pSeries_kick_cpu,
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju