Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: Constify qcom_cc_driver_data
From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Tue Mar 31 2026 - 06:17:41 EST
On 3/31/26 12:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 31/03/2026 11:33, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 3/31/26 11:17 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> The static 'struct qcom_cc_driver_data' contains probe match-like data
>>> and is not modified: neither by the driver defining it nor by common.c
>>> code using it.
>>>
>>> Make it const for code safety and code readability.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.h
>>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct qcom_cc_desc {
>>> size_t num_icc_hws;
>>> unsigned int icc_first_node_id;
>>> bool use_rpm;
>>> - struct qcom_cc_driver_data *driver_data;
>>> + const struct qcom_cc_driver_data *driver_data;
>>
>> This can be a const ptr to const data, even
>
> None of other elements in 'qcom_cc_desc' is const pointer, even though
> they also could. If doing this change, let's make it consistent - so
> shall all of them be const?
I thought about it, but then it turns out that videocc-sm8550.c has:
video_cc_sm8550_driver_data.clk_cbcrs = video_cc_sm8650_critical_cbcrs
So we'd have to duplicate the entire struct
Konrad