Re: [PATCH 2/3] ALSA: ctxfi: Use matching DAIO type for da_desc

[Takashi Iwai]

On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:35:06 +0200,
Harin Lee wrote:
> @@ -1121,7 +1121,8 @@ static int atc_spdif_out_unmute(struct ct_atc *atc, unsigned char state)
>  
>  static int atc_spdif_in_unmute(struct ct_atc *atc, unsigned char state)
>  {
> -	return atc_daio_unmute(atc, state, SPDIFIO);
> +	return atc_daio_unmute(atc, state, (atc->model == CTSB073X) ?
> +		SPDIFI_BAY : SPDIFIO);

It's error-prone to use ternary operators as open code in many places.
Better to define a function instead.

>  }
>  
>  static int atc_spdif_out_get_status(struct ct_atc *atc, unsigned int *status)
> @@ -1429,12 +1430,9 @@ static int atc_get_resources(struct ct_atc *atc)
>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_DAIOTYP; i++) {
>  		if (((i == MIC) && !cap.dedicated_mic) ||
>  		    ((i == RCA) && !cap.dedicated_rca) ||
> -		    i == SPDIFI_BAY)
> +		    (i == ((atc->model == CTSB073X) ? SPDIFIO : SPDIFI_BAY)))

... and this is even reversed value assignment which is rather
confusing.  Rather write with a simple if/else, such as:

		 if ((i == SPDFIO && atc->model == CTSB073X) ||
		     (i == SPDIFI_BAY && atc->model != CTSB073X))
			continue;

>  	atc_connect_dai(atc->rsc_mgrs[SRC], dai,
> -			(struct src **)&atc->srcs[0],
> -			(struct srcimp **)&atc->srcimps[0]);
> +		(struct src **)&atc->srcs[0],
> +		(struct srcimp **)&atc->srcimps[0]);

Avoid unnecessary spacing changes.  The previous code is fine about
indentation.


thanks,

Takashi