Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] firmware: dmi: Add missing DMI entry types

From: Borislav Petkov

Date: Wed Apr 01 2026 - 07:11:25 EST


On Sat, Mar 07, 2026 at 08:10:22AM -0600, Mario Limonciello (AMD) wrote:
> Type 43 through type 46 entry types are missing from the
> definitions in the dmi_entry_type enum.
>
> Link: https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0134_3.7.1.pdf
> Suggested-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v4:
> * Add tag (Yazen)
> * Correct text (Yazen)
> v3:
> * Add tag (Jean)
> ---
> include/linux/dmi.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmi.h b/include/linux/dmi.h
> index 32b2529a73301..2eedf44e68012 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmi.h
> @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ enum dmi_entry_type {
> DMI_ENTRY_ADDITIONAL,
> DMI_ENTRY_ONBOARD_DEV_EXT,
> DMI_ENTRY_MGMT_CONTROLLER_HOST,
> + DMI_ENTRY_TPM_DEVICE,
> + DMI_ENTRY_PROCESSOR_ADDITIONAL,
> + DMI_ENTRY_FIRMWARE_INVENTORY,
> + DMI_ENTRY_STRING_PROPERTY,
> DMI_ENTRY_INACTIVE = 126,
> DMI_ENTRY_END_OF_TABLE = 127,
> };
> --

Is there any particular reason this is a separate patch and not part of patch
1?

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette