Re: [PATCH 0/2] sched/urgent: zero_vruntime fixes

[John Stultz]

On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 6:24 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Slightly modified and with a changelog on patches from the thread here:
>
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CANDhNCr3ooATiBgcnq8CAZ+AwzvmHeoKhjvfy=awF1RKFHydCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Where John found stress-ng-yield made mainline sad.
>
> I have retained the tested-by tags even though I've slightly modified the
> patches; holler if you disagree. Local testing shows its good, and my VM was
> very quick to panic once I had the right ingredients.

Testing ran well overnight! Thank you again for chasing all of these
edge cases down so fast!
-john