Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] mm/mglru: simplify and improve dirty writeback handling

[Shakeel Butt]

On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 03:52:34AM +0800, Kairui Song via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The current handling of dirty writeback folios is not working well for
> file page heavy workloads: Dirty folios are protected and move to next
> gen upon isolation of getting throttled or reactivation upon pageout
> (shrink_folio_list).
> 
> This might help to reduce the LRU lock contention slightly, but as a
> result, the ping-pong effect of folios between head and tail of last two
> gens is serious as the shrinker will run into protected dirty writeback
> folios more frequently compared to activation. The dirty flush wakeup
> condition is also much more passive compared to active/inactive LRU.
> Active / inactve LRU wakes the flusher if one batch of folios passed to
> shrink_folio_list is unevictable due to under writeback, but MGLRU
> instead has to check this after the whole reclaim loop is done, and then
> count the isolation protection number compared to the total reclaim
> number.

I was just ranting about this on Baolin's patch and thanks for unifying them.

> 
> And we previously saw OOM problems with it, too, which were fixed but
> still not perfect [1].
> 
> So instead, just drop the special handling for dirty writeback, just
> re-activate it like active / inactive LRU. And also move the dirty flush
> wake up check right after shrink_folio_list. This should improve both
> throttling and performance.

Please divide this patch into two separate ones. One for moving the flusher
waker (& v1 throttling) within evict_folios() and second the above heuristic of
dirty writeback.