Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] ocfs2: split transactions in dio completion to avoid credit exhaustion
From: Heming Zhao
Date: Thu Apr 02 2026 - 03:52:29 EST
On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 03:07:10PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
>
>
> On 4/2/26 10:26 AM, Heming Zhao wrote:
> > During ocfs2 dio operations, JBD2 may report warnings via following
> > call trace:
> > ocfs2_dio_end_io_write
> > ocfs2_mark_extent_written
> > ocfs2_change_extent_flag
> > ocfs2_split_extent
> > ocfs2_try_to_merge_extent
> > ocfs2_extend_rotate_transaction
> > ocfs2_extend_trans
> > jbd2__journal_restart
> > start_this_handle
> > output: JBD2: kworker/6:2 wants too many credits credits:5450 rsv_credits:0 max:5449
> >
> > To prevent exceeding the credits limit, modify ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() to
> > handle extents in a batch of transaction.
> >
> > Additionally, relocate ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan(). The orphan inode should
> > only be removed from the orphan list after the extent tree update is complete.
> > This ensures that if a crash occurs in the middle of extent tree updates, we
> > won't leave stale blocks beyond EOF.
> >
> > This patch also changes the logic for updating the inode size and removing
> > orphan, making it similar to ext4_dio_write_end_io(). Both operations are
> > performed only when everything looks good.
> >
> > Finally, thanks to Jans and Joseph for providing the bug fix prototype and
> > suggestions.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> > index 09146b43d1f0..0c88f751ffd5 100644
> > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
> > #include "namei.h"
> > #include "sysfile.h"
> >
> > +#define OCFS2_DIO_MARK_EXTENT_BATCH 200
> > +
> > static int ocfs2_symlink_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
> > struct buffer_head *bh_result, int create)
> > {
> > @@ -2277,7 +2279,7 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode,
> > struct ocfs2_alloc_context *meta_ac = NULL;
> > handle_t *handle = NULL;
> > loff_t end = offset + bytes;
> > - int ret = 0, credits = 0;
> > + int ret = 0, credits = 0, batch = 0;
> >
> > ocfs2_init_dealloc_ctxt(&dealloc);
> >
> > @@ -2294,18 +2296,6 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode,
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Delete orphan before acquire i_rwsem. */
> > - if (dwc->dw_orphaned) {
> > - BUG_ON(dwc->dw_writer_pid != task_pid_nr(current));
> > -
> > - end = end > i_size_read(inode) ? end : 0;
> > -
> > - ret = ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan(osb, inode, di_bh,
> > - !!end, end);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - mlog_errno(ret);
> > - }
> > -
> > down_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> > di = (struct ocfs2_dinode *)di_bh->b_data;
> >
> > @@ -2326,24 +2316,25 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode,
> >
> > credits = ocfs2_calc_extend_credits(inode->i_sb, &di->id2.i_list);
> >
> > - handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits);
> > - if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> > - mlog_errno(ret);
> > - goto unlock;
> > - }
> > - ret = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), di_bh,
> > - OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - mlog_errno(ret);
> > - goto commit;
> > - }
> > -
> > list_for_each_entry(ue, &dwc->dw_zero_list, ue_node) {
> > + if (!handle) {
> > + handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits);
> > + if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + goto unlock;
> > + }
> > + ret = ocfs2_journal_access_di(handle, INODE_CACHE(inode), di_bh,
> > + OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + goto commit;
> > + }
> > + }
> > ret = ocfs2_assure_trans_credits(handle, credits);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > mlog_errno(ret);
> > - break;
> > + goto commit;
> > }
> > ret = ocfs2_mark_extent_written(inode, &et, handle,
> > ue->ue_cpos, 1,
> > @@ -2351,19 +2342,43 @@ static int ocfs2_dio_end_io_write(struct inode *inode,
> > meta_ac, &dealloc);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > mlog_errno(ret);
> > - break;
> > + goto commit;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (++batch == OCFS2_DIO_MARK_EXTENT_BATCH) {
> > + ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle);
> > + handle = NULL;
> > + batch = 0;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > if (end > i_size_read(inode)) {
> > + if (!handle) {
> > + handle = ocfs2_start_trans(osb, credits);
> > + if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + goto unlock;
> > + }
> > + }
> > ret = ocfs2_set_inode_size(handle, inode, di_bh, end);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > mlog_errno(ret);
> > }
> > +
> > commit:
> > ocfs2_commit_trans(osb, handle);
>
> Seems checking 'handle' is still missing here.
>
> Joseph
I have a different view.
In the list_for_each_entry(), if it finishes because the condition
(++batch == OCFS2_DIO_MARK_EXTENT_BATCH) is met, the handle will be null.
However, it will be initialized later within the i_size update block.
In my view, the handle must be non-null before entering ocfs2_commit_trans().
- Heming
>
> > unlock:
> > up_write(&oi->ip_alloc_sem);
> > +
> > + /* everything looks good, let's start the cleanup */
> > + if (!ret && dwc->dw_orphaned) {
> > + BUG_ON(dwc->dw_writer_pid != task_pid_nr(current));
> > +
> > + ret = ocfs2_del_inode_from_orphan(osb, inode, di_bh, 0, 0);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + mlog_errno(ret);
> > + }
> > ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, 1);
> > brelse(di_bh);
> > out:
>