Re: [PATCH v8 4/6] selftests/mm/vm_util: robust write_file()
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Date: Thu Apr 02 2026 - 04:11:32 EST
On 4/2/26 03:45, Chunyu Hu wrote:
> Add three more checks for buflen and numwritten. The buflen should be at
> least two, that means at least one char and the null-end. The error case
> check is added by checking numwriten < 0 instead of numwritten < 1. And the
> truncate case is checked. The test will exit if any of these conditions
> aren't met.
>
> Additionally, add more print information when a write failure occurs or
> a truncated write happens, providing clearer diagnostics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v8:
> - go back to ksft_exit_fail_msg in the two error exit path as no clean
> ksft_exit_fail_perror that supports va_list
> Changes in v7:
> - add an empty line before the 'buflen < 1' line. And change to
> 'buflen < 2 to limit the buflen at least to be 2, so at least one char
> is allowed.
> - handle the numwriten < 0 case, which is the error path.
> - use ksft_exit_fail_perror in error exit path.
> - use %.*s to print the buf when error happened
> Changes in v6:
> - save/restore errno before and after the close(), so the log could show
> the correct error info on failure. Suggested by AI.
> Chagnes in v5:
> - new patch for making improve on write_file. Add more safety checks and
> diagnostics info in log
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> index ad96d19d1b85..db94564f4431 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c
> @@ -767,15 +767,24 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
>
> void write_file(const char *path, const char *buf, size_t buflen)
> {
> - int fd;
> + int fd, saved_errno;
> ssize_t numwritten;
>
> + if (buflen < 2)
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("Incorrect buffer len: %zu\n", buflen);
> +
> fd = open(path, O_WRONLY);
> if (fd == -1)
> ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s open failed: %s\n", path, strerror(errno));
>
> numwritten = write(fd, buf, buflen - 1);
> + saved_errno = errno;
> close(fd);
> - if (numwritten < 1)
> - ksft_exit_fail_msg("Write failed\n");
> + errno = saved_errno;
> + if (numwritten < 0)
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s write(%.*s) failed: %s\n", path, (int)(buflen - 1),
> + buf, strerror(errno));
> + if (numwritten != buflen - 1)
> + ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s write(%.*s) is truncated, expected %zu bytes, got %zd bytes\n",
> + path, (int)(buflen - 1), buf, buflen - 1, numwritten);
Ah, yes, code we will never trigger ;)
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Cheers,
David