Re: [PATCH v2] sched_ext: Fix stale direct dispatch state in ddsp_dsq_id
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Thu Apr 02 2026 - 16:10:31 EST
Hello, Andrea.
On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 10:57:43AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> @p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id can be left set (non-SCX_DSQ_INVALID) triggering a
> spurious warning in mark_direct_dispatch() when the next wakeup's
> ops.select_cpu() calls scx_bpf_dsq_insert(), such as:
>
> WARNING: kernel/sched/ext.c:1273 at scx_dsq_insert_commit+0xcd/0x140
>
> The root cause is that ddsp_dsq_id was only cleared in dispatch_enqueue(),
> which is not reached in all paths that consume or cancel a direct dispatch
> verdict. Instead, clear it at the right places:
>
> - direct_dispatch(): cache the direct dispatch state in local variables
> and clear it before dispatch_enqueue() on the synchronous path. For
> the deferred path, the direct dispatch state must remain set until
> process_ddsp_deferred_locals() consumes them.
>
> - process_ddsp_deferred_locals(): cache the dispatch state in local
> variables and clear it before calling dispatch_to_local_dsq(), which
> may migrate the task to another rq.
>
> - do_enqueue_task(): clear the dispatch state on the enqueue path
> (local/global/bypass fallbacks), where the direct dispatch verdict is
> ignored.
>
> - dequeue_task_scx(): clear the dispatch state after dispatch_dequeue()
> to handle both the deferred dispatch cancellation and the holding_cpu
> race, covering all cases where a pending direct dispatch is
> cancelled.
>
> - scx_disable_task(): clear the direct dispatch state when
> transitioning a task out of the current scheduler. Waking tasks may
> have had the direct dispatch state set by the outgoing scheduler's
> ops.select_cpu() and then been queued on a wake_list via
> ttwu_queue_wakelist(), when SCX_OPS_ALLOW_QUEUED_WAKEUP is set. Such
> tasks are not on the runqueue and are not iterated by scx_bypass(),
> so their direct dispatch state won't be cleared. Without this clear,
> when the new scheduler calls scx_enable_task() for these tasks, any
> subsequent ops.select_cpu() call that tries to direct dispatch the
> task will trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE() in mark_direct_dispatch().
Can you add an abbreviated version of the above as functio comment on
clear_direct_dispatch()?
> static void direct_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
> u64 enq_flags)
> {
...
> @@ -1303,6 +1301,12 @@ static void direct_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
> if (dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL && dsq != &rq->scx.local_dsq) {
> unsigned long opss;
>
> + /*
> + * Update the direct dispatch state and keep it until
> + * process_ddsp_deferred_locals() consumes it.
> + */
> + p->scx.ddsp_enq_flags = ddsp_enq_flags;
I know I suggested it but this looks kinda odd. How about we keep the
original p->scx.ddsp_enq_flags |= enq_flags above and then do
...
Cache enq_flags here?
> + clear_direct_dispatch(p);
> + dispatch_enqueue(sch, dsq, p, ddsp_enq_flags | SCX_ENQ_CLEAR_OPSS);
> }
>
> static bool scx_rq_online(struct rq *rq)
...
> @@ -3147,6 +3155,8 @@ static bool task_dead_and_done(struct task_struct *p)
>
> lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
>
> + clear_direct_dispatch(p);
This is task_dead_and_done(), not scx_disable_task(). Is this intended?
Thanks.
--
tejun