Re: Missing signoff in the rdma tree

From: Mark Brown

Date: Mon Apr 06 2026 - 12:38:51 EST


On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 11:10:34AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> Commits
>
> eb15cffa15201 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Support application specific CQs")
> 485a21c14b413 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Separate kernel and user CQ creation paths")
> 9ed273bbe6637 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor bnxt_re_create_cq()")
> 0edac801a2693 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Support doorbell extensions")
> 4e99362444a2f ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor bnxt_qplib_create_qp() function")
> f0579e330b773 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Move the UAPI methods to a dedicated file")
> 9db6a217ba5dd ("RDMA: Add IB_UVERBS_CORE_SUPPORT_ROBUST_UDATA")
> ce150a8376e1e ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Use ib_respond_empty_udata()")
> d59f007207b39 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Use ib_respond_udata()")
> ac4bb15208d1f ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Add missing comp_mask validation")
> 12c73bee53133 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Add compatibility checks to the uapi path for no data")
> ac593f5b66c9d ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Add compatibility checks to the uapi path")
> 6df3a6414d736 ("RDMA: Provide documentation about the uABI compatibility rules")
> 42d2a291ef474 ("RDMA: Add ib_is_udata_in_empty()")
> f1cac281b4245 ("RDMA: Add ib_respond_udata()")
> 4ac738c6a7b90 ("RDMA: Add ib_copy_validate_udata_in_cm()")
> 715eccd4798ec ("RDMA: Add ib_copy_validate_udata_in()")
> ea08d8cb8b520 ("RDMA/core: Add rdma_udata_to_dev()")
> 8e886928a19d7 ("RDMA: Use copy_struct_from_user() instead of open coding")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers

This issue is still present today.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature