Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] perf tool: Add evsel to perf_sample

[Namhyung Kim]

On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 11:11:03PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 08:43:00PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > Nearly all perf code ends up passing an evsel with the perf_sample,
> > which is problematic if you want to rewrite the evsel such as with
> > off-CPU processing - all uses of the evsel need fixing up. Previously
> > I'd mailed this patch as an RFC with everything combined:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260126071822.447368-1-irogers@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > and there was a request to break it up.
> > 
> > I've started the series by adding documentation to struct
> > perf_sample. Next I fixed missing perf_sample__init/exit largely from
> > the recent perf inject callchain rewriting work. The 3rd patch adds
> > the evsel to struct perf_sample and ensures it is correctly
> > initialized. The next 22 patches avoid passing the evsel along with
> > sample for different parts of the perf tool, along with some minor
> > tweaks like constification and not determining the evsel if it is
> > present in the sample.
> 
> I'll test and process the first 3 patches first as I found an issue in
> patch 6 and I guess applying patch 4 would break partial imports later.

Applied the first 3 patches to perf-tools-next, thanks!

Best regards,
Namhyung