Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] net: mana: add ethtool private flag for full-page RX buffers
From: Alexander Lobakin
Date: Tue Apr 07 2026 - 09:12:43 EST
From: Dipayaan Roy <dipayanroy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 20:42:15 -0700
> On some ARM64 platforms with 4K PAGE_SIZE, utilizing page_pool
> fragments for allocation in the RX refill path (~2kB buffer per fragment)
> causes 15-20% throughput regression under high connection counts
> (>16 TCP streams at 180+ Gbps). Using full-page buffers on these
> platforms shows no regression and restores line-rate performance.
>
> This behavior is observed on a single platform; other platforms
> perform better with page_pool fragments, indicating this is not a
> page_pool issue but platform-specific.
>
> This series adds an ethtool private flag "full-page-rx" to let the
> user opt in to one RX buffer per page:
>
> ethtool --set-priv-flags eth0 full-page-rx on
Sorry I may've missed the previous threads.
Has this approach been discussed here? Private flags are generally
discouraged.
Alternatively, you can provide Ethtool ops to change the Rx buffer size,
so that you'd be able to set it to PAGE_SIZE on affected platforms and
the result would be the same.
>
> There is no behavioral change by default. The flag can be persisted
> via udev rule for affected platforms.
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Split prep refactor into separate patch (patch 1/2)
> Changes in v4:
> - Dropping the smbios string parsing and add ethtool priv flag
> to reconfigure the queues with full page rx buffers.
> Changes in v3:
> - changed u8* to char*
> Changes in v2:
> - separate reading string index and the string, remove inline.
>
> Dipayaan Roy (2):
> net: mana: refactor mana_get_strings() and mana_get_sset_count() to
> use switch
> net: mana: force full-page RX buffers via ethtool private flag
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c | 22 ++-
> .../ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_ethtool.c | 164 ++++++++++++++----
> include/net/mana/mana.h | 8 +
> 3 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Thanks,
Olek