Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86/intel-uncore-freq: Expose instance ID in the sysfs
From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman
Date: Tue Apr 07 2026 - 14:19:51 EST
On 2026-04-07 at 11:03:06 -0700, srinivas pandruvada wrote:
>On Thu, 2026-04-02 at 19:59 +0000, Maciej Wieczor-Retman wrote:
>> From: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Insufficient data is exported to allow direct access to TPMI
>> registers
>> through MMIO. On non-partitioned systems domain_id can be used both
>> for
>> mapping CPUs to their compute die IDs and for mapping die indices to
>> their MMIO memory blocks mapped
>> into userspace.
>
>not mapped. But presented to user space via TPMI debugfs.
>> However on partitioned
>> systems it can't be used for mapping MMIO blocks anymore.
>Again not mapping.
Okay, I'll fix these two messages.
...
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-
>> tpmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/uncore-frequency/uncore-frequency-
>> tpmi.c
>> @@ -385,7 +385,19 @@ static u8 io_die_index_next;
>> /* Lock to protect io_die_start, io_die_index_next */
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(domain_lock);
>>
>> -static void set_domain_id(int id, int num_resources,
>> +static void set_instance_id(int id, struct tpmi_uncore_cluster_info
>> *cluster_info)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * On non-partitioned systems domain_id can be used for
>> mapping both
>> + * CPUs to compute die IDs and physical die indexes to MMIO
>> mapped
>> + * memory. However on partitioned systems domain_id loses
>> the second
>> + * association. Therefore instance_id should be used for
>> that instead,
>> + * while domain_id should still be used to match CPUs to
>> compute dies.
>> + */
>> + cluster_info->uncore_data.instance_id = id;
>> +}
>
>Do you need a function for single line assignment? Why not just assign
>in the uncore_probe().
I thought uncore_probe() would be less cluttered if I move this assignment to a
separate function, especially with this longer comment.
But I can move it to uncore_probe(). Do you think the comment is helpful or
should it be shortened? I thought it'd be good to keep some context information
in here too.
--
Kind regards
Maciej Wieczór-Retman